Angular State Management Without RxJS - An Experiment

Angular state management without RxJS - An Experiment. Can it be done with the Stencil Store?

Sep 14, 2020

#angular #javascript #rxjs #webdev

Implementing a state management in modern web Angular applications can be tricky.

There are many libraries, such Ngrx, ngxs, Akita, which can be integrated to manage stores but, these are strongly opinionated and have impact on the architecture of the solution.

If we omit the concept displayed by Jonas Bandi in his interesting article, a common alternative to not using 3rd party libraries, is the development of custom stores with RxJS.

In both cases, libraries or custom, RxJS is used 🤷‍.

Even though RxJS is a wonderful piece of technology, is nowadays a de facto standard when it comes to Angular development, and installed per default with almost any starter kits, it can be still opted-out.

That’s why I was interested to get to know if it would be possible to develop an Angular application using a modern state management but, without using RxJS.


To narrow the goals of the experiment, these are those I was looking to test:

  • Can a property be bind and updated in a template, without having to write extra code or trigger the change detection, as it would be solved with an observable?
  • Can store’s values be accessed in different routes?
  • Can store’s values be retrieved in child components?
  • Can store’s values be used in providers?
  • Is it easy to integrate it in unit tests?

Let’s try to answer these questions, but first, let setup another kind of state management.

Stencil Store

The @stencil/store is a lightweight shared state library by the StencilJS core team. It implements a simple key/value map that efficiently re-renders components when necessary.

I use it in our web open source editor for presentations, DeckDeckGo, and I have to admit, I kind of have a crush for this lightweight store. It is so bare minimum simple, and effective, I obviously selected it to perform my experiment.

Even though it would work out of the box with Angular, note that I had to create a fork. The Webpack’s build was complaining about it and, since we do not need this requirement in case of an Angular usage, I just removed it.

If I, or anyone, would use it for a real application, the library dependency could be patched easily I am guessing.

Source Code

Before going further, note that this experiment’s source code is available on GitHub.


To set up for such a store for an application, we can create a new TypeScript file, such as , and use the createStore function exposed by the Stencil Store.

import { createStore } from "@stencil/store"; const { state } = createStore({ clicks: 0 }); export default { state };

That’s it. It is the minimum to expose a global clicks store for an app.

Because I was eager to give a try to the few other features of the store, I also added the usage of the functions onChange , to test if property listening to changes would also be re-rendered, and the dispose feature needed for testing purpose.

import { createStore } from "@stencil/store"; const { state, onChange, reset, dispose } = createStore({ clicks: 0, count: 0 }); onChange("clicks", (value) => { state.count = value * 2; }); export default { state, dispose };

Pretty slim in my humble opinion 😉.

It is also worth to notice that it is possible to create as many stores as we would need.

#1: Property Binding And Re-render

I tried different ways to use the properties of the store in the templates and, figured out that the easiest way was to bind the state with a component’s variable.

import { Component } from "@angular/core"; import store from "../../stores/"; @Component({ selector: "app-page1", templateUrl: "./page1.component.html", styleUrls: ["./page1.component.css"] }) export class Page1Component { state$$ = store.state; }

It can then be use in a template to display the values of the store.

<p>Clicks: {{state$$.clicks}}</p> <p>Count: {{state$$.count}}</p>

Does it get re-rendered, when the store changes?

To try out this hypothesis, I added a function to the component, which increments the clicks.

inc() { store.state.clicks++; }

Therefore, if everything works as expected, each time I would call the above function, the clicks should be incremented and displayed. Because I registered an onChange on such property, the count should be actualized with twice the value.


It exactly behaves as expected. Store properties are modified and, the layout is re-rendered. In addition, I did not have to implement any custom change detection calls or what so ever.

#2: Routes

The second question I was looking to answer, was related to sharing data between routes. To answer it, I created another page component, added it to the routing and used the store exactly in the same way as previously.

import { Component } from "@angular/core"; import store from "../../stores/"; @Component({ selector: "app-page2", template: `<h1>Page 2</h1> <p>Clicks: {{ state$$.clicks }}</p> <p>Count: {{ state$$.count }}</p>` }) export class Page2Component { state$$ = store.state; }

If this would work out, once I would navigate, I would find the exact same value in each page without having to implement anything else respectively without the need to pass values between routes.


Indeed, stores data can be shared between routes.

#3: Components

Likewise, instead of routes, are data accessible from a component?

To test this hypothesis, I refactored the page2 to move the code to a separate component card .

import { Component } from "@angular/core"; import store from "../../stores/"; @Component({ selector: "app-card", template: `<p>Clicks: {{ state$$.clicks }}</p> <p>Count: {{ state$$.count }}</p>`, styleUrls: ["./card.component.css"] }) export class CardComponent { state$$ = store.state; }

I then used it in page2 . Note that doing so, this component, page, does not have to include the store anymore.

import { Component } from "@angular/core"; @Component({ selector: "app-page2", template: `<h1>Page 2</h1> <app-card></app-card>` }) export class Page2Component {}

As for previous test, this would be validated, if values would be displayed and updated even if use in a child component.


As previously, it works as expected.

#4: Services

I was asking my self if data could also be used in providers , therefore I added a service to test this specific question.

import { Injectable } from "@angular/core"; import store from "../stores/"; @Injectable({ providedIn: "root" }) export class AlertService { show() { alert(`Count: ${store.state.count}`); } }

If I call the service’s function, an alert should be triggered and the current count value of the store should be displayed.


Providers have access to the store.

#5: Test

In addition to the runtime, I was also curious about the integration in unit tests. Probably even more than the integration in applications, the usage of stores and RxJS in tests can be also tricky.

Therefore, I created a test which should increment the clicks and validate that the value has, well, been incremented.

import { ComponentFixture, TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing'; import { Page1Component } from './page1.component'; import store from '../../stores/'; describe('Page1Component', () => { let component: Page1Component; let fixture: ComponentFixture<Page1Component>; beforeEach(async () => { await TestBed.configureTestingModule({ declarations: [ Page1Component ] }) .compileComponents(); }); beforeEach(() => { fixture = TestBed.createComponent(Page1Component); component = fixture.componentInstance; fixture.detectChanges(); }); beforeEach(() => { store.dispose(); }); it('should create', () => { expect(component).toBeTruthy(); }); it('should increment', () => {; fixture.detectChanges(); const paragraph = fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('p:first-of-type'); expect(paragraph.textContent).toEqual('Clicks: 1'); }); });

If this would be correct, the test should pass.


It is possible to use the store in unit tests and thus, without any particular headache. It works in tests the same manner as it work when used in the application.


All hypothesis, re-rendering data, accessing these and testing the store were a success ✅.


The scope of this experiment was to some extension, limited and, it might need a bit more analysis before being applied to a real life application. I think in particular at the following questions:

  • Would it be possible to scope the store, not to the root, but to a particular module? Even though providers provided in root are often used, I think, it would be a nice add-on.
  • How does the rendering performs with a lot of nodes contained in the store? My spontaneous guess is that it behaves exactly like it would behave with or without any other stores but, it is probably worth a try to go a step further and try to render a lot of information.
  • What’s the cost of the Stencil Store in comparison to any other libraries based on RxJS or RxJS itself. If I would have to bet right now, I would bet on the fact that the Stencil Store is maybe the lightest. According bundlephobia, it costs only 899 bytes (minified + gzipped) 🤯.
  • Stencil is server side rendering (SSR) and pre-rendering compatible. Therefore, as the store has been developed in first place for such technology, I am guessing that it would be also the case with Angular. However, this would have to be tested too.

If you are interested in these questions, let me know. I would love to hear from you, to get your feedbacks and would be happy to continue the experiment 😃.

Take Away

Honestly? I am that close to find a new idea of application, just to try out concretely the Stencil Store in a modern web Angular application. There is often no better way to experiment, than developing a real application.

To infinity and beyond!


Reach me out on Twitter and, why not, give a try to DeckDeckGo for your next presentations!

It deploys your decks online as Progressive Web Apps and can even push your slides’ source code to GitHub.